[
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kay Chau reassigned MIFOS-2914:
-------------------------------
Assignee: emilytucker (was: johnwoodlock)
Emily, this sounds like an issue in GK's own branch progress report as we do
not keep track of aging buckets in our table as John saw. Can you follow up
with Naganand and see if we are misunderstanding anything?
> Aging in Arrears table inaccurate
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: MIFOS-2914
> URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-2914
> Project: mifos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Database
> Reporter: emilytucker
> Assignee: emilytucker
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: Shamim D
>
>
> According to Naganand the summary table in Mifos, Aging in Arrears (not sure
> the exact table name), is not being populated correctly.
> Scenario: Client has a weekly loan that has 3 missed installments of 100Rs
> each. The most overdue installment is 3 weeks late, the more recently missed
> installment is a few days late.
> Expected: In the aging in arrears table, these values should be populated
> like this:
> 1-7 Days in areas: 100Rs
> 7-14 days in arrears: 100Rs.
> 14-21 days in arrears: 100
> Actual
> 1-7 Days in areas: 0
> 7-14 days in arrears: 0.
> 14-21 days in arrears: 300
> Basically ALL overdue installments are appears in the aging bucket of the
> oldest/most late installment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues
