[
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-4313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
jbrewster updated MIFOS-4313:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: Elsie F
> Inconsistancy in Loan Transaction History for Dates
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIFOS-4313
> URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-4313
> Project: mifos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Loan Account
> Affects Versions: Release 1.6.1
> Reporter: Ryan Whitney
> Assignee: jbrewster
> Fix For: Elsie F
>
>
> See this thread for reference:
> http://groups.google.com/group/mifosusers/browse_thread/thread/5c2871c1ffa71bb6#
> Original post to user groups:
> Just looking at a loan with some transactions. There were two transactions
> entered for 11/17 and 11/23 that should up in the Recenty Activity.
> When I click on ³View Transaction History², I see those payments listed and
> there are two dates listed. ³Date² and ³Date Posted², which are both the
> same dates (11/18 and 11/24 respectively).
> So the transactions were entered in one day later than the actual
> transaction was occurred. Seems to me that transaction date should still
> show up (the 11/17 and 11/23) on this page. I tried looking for the
> functional spec for this view, but didn¹t find anything on mifos.org.
> Thoughts? Should one of those dates be equal to the transaction date or
> should we add a new column?
> Also, this may be an opportunity for us to nail down the different dates
> attached to a transaction and enter some enhancements to get this to sync up
> between the UI and database. Quickly, off the top of my head, I see the
> following for a loan payment -
> Create Date: Date the record was entered into mifos (should be a time stamp)
> Due Date: Date the payment was due
> Transaction Date: Date the actual transaction was conducted
> Receipt Date: Option receipt field with attached date
> -----
> It feels like in this (and Gayl Kennedy's follow-up), were seeing some
> inconsistent behavior and some data we would like to see is not showing up.
> If we enter a backdated transaction, it seems to me that in the transaction
> history it should list the date the transaction physically occurred and not
> just when it was entered into Mifos (but that should be displayed as well).
> It also appears we may be getting different behavior depending on how the
> entry was made (CSE vs manual).
> I see this as the following:
> 1. TEst these scenarios to see if their behavior is consistant
> - CSE of on-time payments, made on the day of the transactions
> - CSE of on-time payments, made on a day later than the actual transactions
> (date of trans was 12/6, entry into mifos was 12/8)
> - Manual entry of on-time payments, on the day of the transaction
> - Manual entry of on-time payments, made on a day after the actual transaction
> - Manual entry of late payment, made on a day of the late payment
> - Manual entry of late payment, made on a day later than the actual
> transaction
> 2. Evaluate naming convention of dates within the Mifos UI and database to
> validate they are
> * Consistant in naming
> * consistant in how they are used (are different functions populating them
> the same way?)
> - I could see this as a separate task item.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment
to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues
