[
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOSBI-165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=64665#action_64665
]
Adam Balcerzak commented on MIFOSBI-165:
----------------------------------------
Just to clarify this issue.
The difference in number of groups in Client Summary is because of showing both
GroupStatus-Active and GroupStatus-OnHold groups in contrast to showing only
GroupStatus-Active groups in Group Formation. In this case there was one OnHold
group valid from 2010-09-04.
Moreover groups in Group Formation are created by current Officer what is not
checked with groups in Client Summary. In this case there is one group formed
by other loan officer within groups in Client Summary.
In the end I have restricted the number of groups only to active groups. I have
left unchanged condition about which officer formed a group.
> inconsistent totals for Loan Officer Detailed Report # of groups
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIFOSBI-165
> URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOSBI-165
> Project: mifos business intelligence
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Reports
> Affects Versions: Mifos BI 1.0
> Reporter: jbrewster
> Assignee: Adam Balcerzak
> Fix For: Mifos BI 1.1 - Iteration 2, Mifos BI 1.1
>
>
> From Jakub:
> Doubts about Loan Officer Detailed Report. I have created two test cases:
> 1) Office: br2, Loan Officer: br2 LO xxx, Period Start: 2010-07-01, Period
> End: 2010-09-30
> 2) Office: br2, Loan Officer: br2 LO xxx, Period Start: 2010-07-01, Period
> End: 2010-08-15
> and received the following results:
> 1) # of groups added(To Date): 3
> # of groups added(This Period): 3
> ...
> # of groups: 5
> 2) # of groups added(To Date): 3
> # of groups added(This Period): 3
> ...
> # of groups: 4
> Isn't this strange that # of groups is bigger than # of groups added to date?
> Why # of groups is bigger as of 2010-09-30, if # of groups added to date is
> the same in both results?
> From kay: I wonder if the Summary section is doing as of TODAY instead of as
> of the last date in the date range. It should be the latter, so can we add
> an issue for this. Also maybe we should make the heading of the box more
> clear - it should say "Client Summary - As of xx/xx/xxxx" where the date is
> the last date of date range run.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues
