[ 
http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-2842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=69851#comment-69851
 ] 

Lukasz Chudy commented on MIFOS-2842:
-------------------------------------

Removed label: acceptancetest
                
> Can only run a single acceptance test on command line if it's part of "smoke" 
> group
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MIFOS-2842
>                 URL: http://mifosforge.jira.com/browse/MIFOS-2842
>             Project: mifos
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Build and Testing
>            Reporter: Jeff Brewster
>            Assignee: mifosdeveloperqueue
>              Labels: Testing, volunteer
>             Fix For: Unscheduled
>
>
> Keith noted you can't execute a single Acceptance test from the command line 
> if the test is not part of the smoke test group.  This is due to the change 
> that was made to only run smoke tests on the local dev machine.  If a 
> specific test is given as a parameter, seems like this filter should be 
> ignored.
> irc log:
> [09:34]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, I thought you might have a clue why 
> no test methods run when I manually execute an acceptance test. It is 
> AdditionalHolidayTest
> [09:35]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, I don't see any annotations that 
> might suppress tests.
> [09:37]       <jbrewster>     keith_p: when you run acceptance tests locally, 
> your build will only run the "smoke" group tests. are you running all tests 
> locally or executing that single AdditionalHolidayTest? Through command line 
> or via eclipse?
> [09:38]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, From the command line, mvn 
> integration-test -Dtest=AdditionalHolidayTest
> [09:39]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, I got a weird error with trying to 
> run in Eclipse, so went back to command-line testing
> [09:39]       <jbrewster>     keith_p: hmm let me try
> [09:41]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, HolidayTest runs fine, but it is in 
> the "smoke" group.
> [09:42]       <jbrewster>     keith_p: yea, I haven't tried running 
> individual tests via cmd line since the configuration was changed to only do 
> smoke on local dev box. that may be the filter that's stopping you from 
> running that test
> [09:42]       <jbrewster>     I'll let you know if I get the same result
> [09:43]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, Well, I could temporarily make it a 
> smoke test, or get Eclipse-based testing to work...
> [09:46]       <jbrewster>     keith_p: yes, temp. adding it to smoke should 
> be a good workaround. could also try mvn integration-test -Dgroup=holiday I 
> haven't tried that but it might pick up that test.
> [09:46]       <jbrewster>     my machine is slow - still waiting for cargo 
> start...
> [09:51]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, Well, the good news is that the 
> tests ran as smoke tests. The bad news is that they all failed :(
> [09:52]       <keith_p>       jbrewster, I'll debug after lunch... Let me 
> know the results of your test run.
> [09:53]       <jbrewster>     keith_p: :( I got the same behavior as you - no 
> tests were executed. seems like something we should try to address. I'll log 
> an issue

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
http://mifosforge.jira.com/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues

Reply via email to