vishwas picked up on the following things:

1. The idea was to create a one-to-one table to add additional fields to the m_loan_transaction table in order to capture extra transaction details based on the type of transaction that happened (cash, cheque, receipt, ELECTRONIC_FUND_TRANSFER) but you have used a many to one relationship

2. The table to capture additional details was called m_payment_detail? shouldnt it be m_loan_transaction_detail?

3. Some fields on the additional table you expect naturally to be unique such as receipt_number, cheque_number, routing_code but have no constraints on them

Change By: keithwoodlock (21/Apr/13 8:05 AM)
Status: Ready for Testing / Resolved Reopened
Resolution: Fixed
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Mifos-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-issues

Reply via email to