Hi George, No, its wasn't a question of whats more powerful/efficient, when we started out on the tool, the smart way to implement(re-use existing code) the data migration tool which would be easy to maintain would have been using the API's. But at the time of development, there were no API's to speak of.
So the tool was built so it could work without the API's, and eventually be replaced by the API's when its usable. Meanwhile we decided that it was easier to use pentaho as people would be using it for other mifos needs and would be familiar with it. On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:28 PM, George IBERIA <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry for asking again (it was discussed on the DEV meeting but need some > clarifications ) : > Do you think that using BI kettle is more useful , less risky and takes less > time then to implement migration using Mifos import API ? Wit with the > assumption that import API may need some modification / extension / > improvement, etc. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this > data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d > Mifos-developer mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe or change settings at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-developer > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mifos Developer" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mifosdeveloper?hl=en.
