I like the passive cooling option available on the 1009.
Depends on where you're installing them.
On March 12, 2018 11:00:11 AM CDT, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
>I think that's probably the deciding factor. I'd rather have a fiber
>and not need it than need it and not have it.
>Also looks like Streakwave has a single 1016 but dozens of 1009 so I'm
>guessing everyone else prefers the 1009...
>Thanks for the thoughts.
>1100 Wayne St
>Troy, OH 45373
>On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:56 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
>> Both are fine and work as expected. I wouldn't plan on v7 anytime
>> Also, you probably don't need a lot of cores unless you
>> are using something in Mikrotik that will work with multiple cores.
>> not BGP)
>> Even if you don't think you need it, it's always better to have a
>> port than not have it.
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
>> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> I'm debating on the CCR1016-12G versus CCR1009-7G-1C-1S+
>>> With a few more cores I'm expecting ROS v7 to help it be a bit
>>> don't really need it, but for such a small price I'd rather not
>>> sooner rather than later. I did want to see if there are any known
>>> with the 1016 models from the group, though.
>>> I don't need the combo or SFP+ port. It's all ethernet for me.
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Mikrotik-users mailing list