Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled on the AP. The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no option for Multicast Enhancement. Should I disable the enhancement on the AP only? I assume I have to enable Multicast on these links. (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is 3.65 GHz - 802.11n "M" gear).
There is an RB750 switch (software bridge). L2 MTU 1598. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users < mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it works for a while > then stops, then comes back. Disabling the instance as you do to fix it > makes the whole adjacency start over which starts with new LSAs. > Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to establish the > adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just allows for the election of > the DR/BDR and more than two endpoints compared to Point-to-point network > type. Anyway, it’s not the issue. > Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently disabled) > Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is there a switch between the > two UBNT links in the middle? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < > mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > > In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and > then put your good IPs on top of the eoip? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson <ajohn...@thewisp.net> > wrote: > >> Ours was/is a /29. >> >> >> *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <ajohn...@thewisp.net> >> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >> *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/> >> <http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < >> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >> >>> Between the two routers it's a /30 >>> >>> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch. >>> About 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted). >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> Suite 1337 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users < >>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>> >>>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks >>>> around these links? >>>> >>>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote: >>>> > Hey Josh, >>>> > >>>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. >>>> What >>>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24 >>>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where the >>>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these >>>> scenarios. >>>> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each >>>> has >>>> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary >>>> and >>>> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency and >>>> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the >>>> same >>>> > result. >>>> > >>>> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but was >>>> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that >>>> it >>>> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in >>>> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this for >>>> > about 8 months now. >>>> > >>>> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround >>>> that >>>> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and imho >>>> is >>>> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel. >>>> > >>>> > Cheers! >>>> > >>>> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>>> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>>> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=460+TAMPICO,IL+61283&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * >>>> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>>> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users >>>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750. >>>> > >>>> > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Josh Luthman >>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> > 1100 Wayne St >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> > Suite 1337 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> > Troy, OH 45373 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org >>>> > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>> > >>>> > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run >>>> > broadcast. I always run Point-to-point over wireless links >>>> with >>>> > exactly two endpoints. A lot of that is leftover from when >>>> most >>>> > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast. >>>> > >>>> > What connects the two backhauls? Crossover cable? Switch, >>>> > smart or dumb, brand? >>>> > >>>> > Which interface are you using on the 1009? Is it a combo >>>> port? >>>> > Is it in the switch group? >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix >>>> > SysAdmin >>>> > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > >
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
