Butch, Thanks for the reply. I could have sworn I had tried that but maybe not. I will set it up next week some time and let everyone know. Terri Kelley Network Engineer 254-697-6710
This email message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above, and may contain, together with any attachment(s), confidential information that is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying or distribution of this message and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. On Jun 26, 2008, at 7:53 PM, Butch Evans wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, Terri Kelley wrote: > >> Is it possible to nat one lan side ethernet port but not the rest? >> For instance, ether1 is wan and 2 - 4 are lan. I would like for >> traffic on ether2 to be nat'ed but not ether3 or 4. > > If ether2=192.168.1.0/24 network, then: > /ip firewall nat > add chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.1.0/24 out-interface=ether1 \ > action=masquerade > > > > -- > ******************************************************************** > *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation * > *Network Engineering *MikroTik RouterOS * > *573-276-2879 *ImageStream * > *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE * > *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Wired or Wireless Networks * > ******************************************************************** > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080627/d869b0ec/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: LogoHzlsigtest.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2158 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20080627/d869b0ec/attachment.jpg
