Isn't limit-at more of carving a reserved chunk of bandwidth out for
the rule? I.e limit-at=120k will make sure this is always got 120k ?
John Buwa
Michiana Wireless,Inc
574-233-7170
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 31, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Butch Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 18:15 -0600, Dennis Burgess wrote:
Bursting, is based on "average" data usage. If the average data
usage
goes over the burst-threshold, then the customer will not be able to
reach the burst speed. So if you burst threshold should be set
typically to slightly lower than the limit-at. That way, once they
"average' over that burst threshold, they can no longer reach the
bust-limit. So then they will stay at their limit-at.
Close...not "limit-at", though. This should read "max-limit" in the
places you have limit-at.
--
********************************************************************
* Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering *
* http://www.wispa.org/ * Wired or Wireless Networks *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE! *
********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
RouterOS
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
