Would anything from 32-63 overlap with the old subnet? If not, it should
work, as the more specific route will take precedence (assuming you are
running some kind of routing protocol or will have routes between the
two routers statically)
Hard to answer for sure without more information but it's possible to
make it work with overlapping subnets if you have to.
On 9/9/2011 5:13 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
Routing will be a problem.
How are you going to tell a router customer .1 is here, .5 is there, etc.?
There are thousands of /26 networks available that are non-routing. What
about creating a new /26 out of 10.x.x.x and NAT it until you get
everyone moved?
On 9/9/2011 5:34 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
We put up a new AP on a POP where we already have 6 operating APs. The
plan is to split off about 25 existing subscribers on one of the old
APs and put them on this new AP.
So we have all the subs (about 50) in one /26 (x.y.x.0/26). The ones
we're going to move I need to put on a separate subnet, as everything
is different, but I don't have enough IPs in a completely different
subnet to just move them over at the moment.
Would there be an issue to create a new subnet (x.y.z.32/27), and move
all the ones we want on the new AP to this subnet? This would overlap
with the old subnet for the short time we're moving everyone.
Then after they're moved, I'll take the old x.y.z.0/26 and change it
to x.y.z.0/27.
--
Simon Westlake
[email protected]
(920) 351-1010
Powercode ISP Billing and Network Management [www.powercode.com]
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
