Do you believe you're going to get any better results with an RB?  If so I
can show you my last four 751's - max uptime of just a couple of weeks.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Rory McCann <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Travis-
>
> I've looked at those units many times, but I've also read reports of
> random lockups and reboots with them and the x86 version of routerOS. Have
> you had any issues with them and if so, what version have you found to be
> the most stable?
>
>
> Rory McCann
> Minn-Kota Ag Products
> P: 701-403-4877 | E: [email protected]
>
>
> On 8/7/2012 9:24 AM, Travis Johnson wrote:
>
>> These are the best little X86 based boxes you can buy (for the money). We
>> have some we are pushing over 100Mbps and the CPU is less than 10%:
>>
>> http://www.balticnetworks.com/**routermaxx-6-port-gigabit-**
>> router-dual-core.html<http://www.balticnetworks.com/routermaxx-6-port-gigabit-router-dual-core.html>
>>
>> Travis
>> Microserv
>>
>> On 8/7/2012 8:16 AM, Rory McCann wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I lost my "beloved" RB1000 the other day due to fan failure and it's
>>> time to start considering what I should replace it with (and what to stock
>>> a spare of).
>>>
>>> This will be a router for my company (not a WISP). Our internet feed is
>>> 50Mb and on average, I would say there is no more than 25-30Mbit being
>>> pushed through the unit, however I did notice a huge performance hit when I
>>> plopped in my temporary RB750 to get my internet connection back up and
>>> running. I don't run much in the way of simple queues other than Butch's
>>> QoS script. I have a handful of firewall rules dictating which subnets can
>>> talk to who. The router also has an EoIP tunnel to another router for
>>> failover and acts as a PPTP VPN server.
>>>
>>> I'm looking for something that will offer similar performance to what my
>>> RB1000 provided me. Port count isn't critical, but I'd like at least 3 and
>>> they have to be gigabit. I'm not overly concerned about rackmount or not as
>>> I have a shelf I could set the unit on. By far the most critical piece
>>> though has to be stability - both in the platform itself and ethernet
>>> performance.
>>>
>>> So far, I've been looking at the RB450G, the RB1200 and the RB800. I've
>>> looked at a few of the x86 boards, but I believe these might be overkill
>>> for my particular application.
>>>
>>> What do you guys think?
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Mikrotik mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>>
>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>> RouterOS
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/**
> attachments/20120807/8055cd9f/**attachment.html<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120807/8055cd9f/attachment.html>
> >
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik>
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> RouterOS
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120807/8fd6dd97/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Reply via email to