Better to not use the .0 and .255 addresses. Weirdness may result... On 01/17/2013 02:30 PM, Micah Miller wrote: > We are replacing a cisco router that is doing many to many nat. > >>From the looks of it, it's taking a public network /24 and natting to a > private network /24. > > Would the following example work? > > > > /ip firewall nat chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=1.1.1.0/24 > to-addresses=172.16.16.0-172.16.16.255 > > > > Micah Miller > > Network/Server Administrator > > Network Business Systems, Inc. > > Phone: 309-944-8823 > > email: [email protected] > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20130117/6cb0bc5c/attachment.html> > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS > _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
