Just to chime in, I run 5.26 exclusively until the 6.x series has had enough time to work out the bugs for a proper FOA. Depending on your IP ranges, ipv6 will consume 2x to 4x the resources that ipv4 does, rendering anything rb1100 and below useless for my ipv6 rollout. We are transitioning to non-software based ospf routers (asics) as the software based simply won't scale well enough for our needs. How many routes are you predicting?
FWIW, we have always seen weird random issues on the mtiks resolved by resetting the OSPF module. Neither Foundry or Cisco has reproduced the behavior, it's isolated to mtik. This has gotten them banned from the core. Mtik's handling of OSPF is flaky at best, but many issues were related to layer 2 situations as well. So if you haven't started by examining your layer 2 and ensuring it is inline with best practices, that's where you start. In our case, cisco and brocade is where our journey ended. Mike Miller Senior Network Administrator Synergy Broadband [email protected] P: 734-222-6060 x104 F: 801-640-8001 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 1:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Mikrotik Digest, Vol 77, Issue 4 Send Mikrotik mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Mikrotik digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: OSPF on v6 (Grand Avenue Broadband) 2. Re: OSPF on v6 (Scott Lambert) 3. Re: (no subject) (Wayne Hancock) 4. Re: (no subject) (Scott Reed) 5. BCP tunnels (Eric Tykwinski) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 10:54:31 -0700 From: Grand Avenue Broadband <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF on v6 To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Now you guys have me worried. Our entire network is on 6.10. Is there any particular reason none of you are using that one? On May 8, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Scott Reed <[email protected]> wrote: > Was everything showing Full as the State? > Were there errors in the log? > > We have a mix of 5.26, 6.9 and 6.11 with no issues. > > On 5/8/2014 12:11 PM, Wayne Hancock wrote: >> In my use case, I have ~ 130 routers connecting on a /24 Network/VLAN >> (Canopy solution). Seems odd that I'd have no issues with the 6.9 code but >> do with the 6.11... Even odder is that it isn't just the 6.11's that have >> the issue, if I have ANY 6.11's on the segment joining OSPF I can get this >> behavior on other routers... Only reason found that it was related to 6.11 >> is I in frustration decided to move everything back to 6.9 to get all the >> routers on the same version. (Problem started after I started letting 6.11 >> devices on the network). >> >> -=Wayne Hancock =- >> SandRidge Energy, Inc. >> 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave >> Oklahoma City, OK 73102 >> 405-429-6195 >> [email protected] >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jon Paul >> Kelley >> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 10:43 AM >> To: 'Mikrotik discussions' >> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) >> >> I have several routers running 6.11 and OSPF and have seen no such issues. >> >> Jon Paul Kelley >> CKS Wireless >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wayne >> Hancock >> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:23 AM >> To: Mikrotik discussions >> Subject: [Mikrotik] (no subject) >> >> Did anyone else encounter weird issues with 6.11 and OSPF? I had sites that >> were showing neighbor adjacency, but were receiving no routes... >> >> On 6.9 I don't have the issue. >> >> -=Wayne Hancock =- >> SandRidge Energy, Inc. >> 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave >> Oklahoma City, OK 73102 >> 405-429-6195 >> [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> >> > > -- > Scott Reed > Owner > NewWays Networking, LLC > Wireless Networking > Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced > Certified www.nwwnet.net > (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239 > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:13:09 -0500 From: Scott Lambert <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OSPF on v6 To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:54:31AM -0700, Grand Avenue Broadband wrote: > Now you guys have me worried. Our entire network is on 6.10. Is > there any particular reason none of you are using that one? > If you are not having problems, don't worry about it. There were a few bugs, mostly PPP related. If your use scenario doesn't hit them, you shouldn't care. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [email protected] ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 18:56:49 +0000 From: Wayne Hancock <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Yes, full state, nothing of note in the logs... -=Wayne Hancock =- SandRidge Energy, Inc. 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave Oklahoma City, OK 73102 405-429-6195 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Reed Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:31 AM To: Mikrotik discussions Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) Was everything showing Full as the State? Were there errors in the log? We have a mix of 5.26, 6.9 and 6.11 with no issues. On 5/8/2014 12:11 PM, Wayne Hancock wrote: > In my use case, I have ~ 130 routers connecting on a /24 Network/VLAN (Canopy > solution). Seems odd that I'd have no issues with the 6.9 code but do with > the 6.11... Even odder is that it isn't just the 6.11's that have the issue, > if I have ANY 6.11's on the segment joining OSPF I can get this behavior on > other routers... Only reason found that it was related to 6.11 is I in > frustration decided to move everything back to 6.9 to get all the routers on > the same version. (Problem started after I started letting 6.11 devices on > the network). > > -=Wayne Hancock =- > SandRidge Energy, Inc. > 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave > Oklahoma City, OK 73102 > 405-429-6195 > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jon Paul > Kelley > Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 10:43 AM > To: 'Mikrotik discussions' > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) > > I have several routers running 6.11 and OSPF and have seen no such issues. > > Jon Paul Kelley > CKS Wireless > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wayne > Hancock > Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:23 AM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: [Mikrotik] (no subject) > > Did anyone else encounter weird issues with 6.11 and OSPF? I had sites that > were showing neighbor adjacency, but were receiving no routes... > > On 6.9 I don't have the issue. > > -=Wayne Hancock =- > SandRidge Energy, Inc. > 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave > Oklahoma City, OK 73102 > 405-429-6195 > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > -- Scott Reed Owner NewWays Networking, LLC Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239 _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 16:28:11 -0400 From: Scott Reed <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Not sure what you have. In all versions we have run OSPF on I have seen when, after making OSPF changes, a router get routes it only gets 10-20 and then sits there. Normally I can get it to get the full table by doing the following in a terminal window rout ospf ins dis 0; en 0 The disable and enable commands are on the same line because when the disable happens all routes are lost and so I loose connectivity. The router goes on to turn it back on and I usually stay connected and it recalculates routes fast enough to stay connected. Occasionally, it is the adjacent router that needs to be "kicked." On 5/8/2014 2:56 PM, Wayne Hancock wrote: > Yes, full state, nothing of note in the logs... > > -=Wayne Hancock =- > SandRidge Energy, Inc. > 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave > Oklahoma City, OK 73102 > 405-429-6195 > [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Reed > Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 11:31 AM > To: Mikrotik discussions > Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) > > Was everything showing Full as the State? > Were there errors in the log? > > We have a mix of 5.26, 6.9 and 6.11 with no issues. > > On 5/8/2014 12:11 PM, Wayne Hancock wrote: >> In my use case, I have ~ 130 routers connecting on a /24 Network/VLAN >> (Canopy solution). Seems odd that I'd have no issues with the 6.9 code but >> do with the 6.11... Even odder is that it isn't just the 6.11's that have >> the issue, if I have ANY 6.11's on the segment joining OSPF I can get this >> behavior on other routers... Only reason found that it was related to 6.11 >> is I in frustration decided to move everything back to 6.9 to get all the >> routers on the same version. (Problem started after I started letting 6.11 >> devices on the network). >> >> -=Wayne Hancock =- >> SandRidge Energy, Inc. >> 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave >> Oklahoma City, OK 73102 >> 405-429-6195 >> [email protected] >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jon Paul >> Kelley >> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 10:43 AM >> To: 'Mikrotik discussions' >> Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] (no subject) >> >> I have several routers running 6.11 and OSPF and have seen no such issues. >> >> Jon Paul Kelley >> CKS Wireless >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Wayne >> Hancock >> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:23 AM >> To: Mikrotik discussions >> Subject: [Mikrotik] (no subject) >> >> Did anyone else encounter weird issues with 6.11 and OSPF? I had sites that >> were showing neighbor adjacency, but were receiving no routes... >> >> On 6.9 I don't have the issue. >> >> -=Wayne Hancock =- >> SandRidge Energy, Inc. >> 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave >> Oklahoma City, OK 73102 >> 405-429-6195 >> [email protected] >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> >> > -- > Scott Reed > Owner > NewWays Networking, LLC > Wireless Networking > Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced > Certified www.nwwnet.net > (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239 > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik > > Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik > RouterOS > > -- Scott Reed Owner NewWays Networking, LLC Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 Toll-free (855) 231-6239 ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 19:09:17 -0400 From: Eric Tykwinski <[email protected]> Subject: [Mikrotik] BCP tunnels To: Mikrotik discussions <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lab question: Not super important, but trying to figure something out. I'm trying to route a C-class to my home lab. So being dynamic at my house, I set up a tunnel using L2TP and then using PPTP. After failing on LT2P, I'm following the instructions at: http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:BCP_bridging_%28PPP_tunnel_bridging%29 It doesn't seem to get me anywhere, but the only basic change is that I'm using a loopback bridge for the server location. Setup is basically: Internet <-> Eth1 -> MT1 bridge <-> Tunnel <-> MT2 bridge -> Vlan public I can't ping x.x.x.2 from bridge interface x.x.x.1 and vice versa, MACs are setup on both Bridges DE:AD:BE:EF:00:01, and DE:AD:BE:EF:00:02. PPTP tunnel and L2TP both worked fine... Sincerely, Eric Tykwinski TrueNet, Inc. P: 610-429-8300 F: 610-429-3222 ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for Mikrotik tutorials. End of Mikrotik Digest, Vol 77, Issue 4 *************************************** _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://mail.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
