On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Markus Wiederkehr wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Markus Wiederkehr >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Here's a list of the remaining open issues: >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-34 >>>> not sure if this one has not already been resolved; please read my >>>> latest comment >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-58 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-68 >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-69 >>>> target for 0.7? >>> >>> I have re-targeted these for 0.7.. >>> >>> Markus >>> >> >> As soon as there is some kind of a decision about MIME4J-34 I'll start >> preparing the release packages. > > if you're happy with my resolution, then the issue can be closed
+1 I think you've made a good point with #112. I also believe that perfect reproduction of a message would be a necessity if a Mime4j DOM should ever be used for verifying an S/MIME signature.. Regarding 0.6 I think we can build a release candidate now.. Cheers Markus > > - robert > -- Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
