On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > <snip> > > i worry about the quantity of copying and new buffers that will need > to be created to store a single complex, large document when every > component has to be stored as a string and also as bytes to ensure > round tripping in non-compliant corner cases.
Well at least I am confident that Mime4j does not perform worse than it did before. Field always held the raw data. Only not it's a ByteSequence instead of a String. Both are immutable and are not copied because of that. Markus
