With "pure" I mean the work that you guys deliver without me polluting anything.
Thanks for pointing me to the sources, they compile perfectly in Eclipse. I agree with everything else you say. Wim Jongman > "pure" sources are the one without generated stuff. > > maven make it simple to invoke javacc automatically while building the > project. If you want you can study the pom and run javacc manually. > > I can't believe that to propose a new bundle you have to produce > generated sources. Generated sources are interim artifacts that shuold > not be used anywhere except, maybe, debugging. > > BTW, the file we publish in the maven repository: > > http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/james/apache-mime4j/0.6/apache-mime4j-0.6-sources.jar > Should include also generated sources (because the purpose of that file > is to be used in IDE for debugging). > > Stefano > > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Wim Jongman wrote: > >> > >>> Might i suggest that (for the future) the generated files are also > bundled > >>> in the source drop? Some people (me for one) do not have maven on their > >>> desktops. > >>> Thanks and best regards, > >>> > >>> Wim > >>> > >> Well, when dealing with the source dist you should be prepared to have > the > >> primary build tool available - which in case of mime4j is maven2. > >> > >> I understand your position, but in this case the generated source files > are > >> build artefacts which don't belong in a source distribution. > >> > >> > >> Bernd > >> > > > >
