On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 13:34 +0100, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> 2010/1/7 Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]>:
<snip> >> > I personally prefer to have your changes merged in several iterations, >> > package by package, starting with low level stuff in 'parser' and 'io' >> > packages. Feel free to ignore me, though. >> >> It is NOT possible. Just look at the changelog. Every step is very >> well explained in the commit and in the relative JIRA issue. >> > > Isn't it great that now we have 'all or nothing' decision to make? <sigh> i should have probably posted something earlier but it's hard for me to justify time on this IMHO the "rules for revolutionaries" only really works for large projects with lots of developers at james, IMO forking the code base was a fundamental reason why the development community almost destroyed itself a few years ago. so i've tried to persuade people to work together on trunk whether development can be collaborative, not on branches. </sigh> rather than start this destructive cycle again, might i suggest that the branch is just used as a useful sandbox and changes are cherry picked rather than merged. - robert
