Ok.... I will have a look later today Bye Norman
Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2010 schrieb Niklas Therning <[email protected]>: > Personally I'm fine with just the MIME4J-138 changes which has been committed > in the branch already. > > /Niklas > > On 12/27/2010 05:22 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > > Ok.. anything else you want to change before I prepare for the vote ? > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2010/12/27 Niklas Therning<[email protected]>: > > That would be great! > > On 12/27/2010 08:49 AM, Norman Maurer wrote: > > Yes, the maven release plugin will help... Should I take care and act > as release manager ? > > Bye > Norman > > > Am Montag, 27. Dezember 2010 schrieb Niklas Therning<[email protected]>: > > Should we start a formal vote on this one? > > /Niklas > > On 12/17/2010 02:21 PM, Norman Maurer wrote: > > +1, > Norman > > > 2010/12/17 Niklas Therning<[email protected]>: > > I just committed the MIME4J-138 changes to the 0.6 bug fix branch. > > +1 from me on releasing 0.6.1 with only MIME4J-138 as changes. > > /Niklas > > On 12/17/2010 10:43 AM, Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > I just had a quick review of the issues fixed in 0.7 and I didn't find > other issues (apart MIME4J-138) to be backported. Most of the other > bugfix/improvements requires bigger refactorings and they are not > critical as MIME4J-138. > > So maybe we should simply push 0.6.1 with only MIME4J-138 as changes. > Is there anything else we should put in 0.6.1 before attempting a > release? > > Stefano > > > > > > > > > >
