On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 07:20 +0100, Norman Maurer wrote: > I think its safe to remove the class. If someone really want to use it > he/she can just "fork" it.. > > Bye, > Norman >
Folks I was not aware of MIME4J-24. My bad. I do think, though, this class is simply out of scope for mime4j, is not used anywhere by mime4j itself, and probably should have never been included in the first place. I will revert the change if someone asks for it. Oleg
