2011/7/18 Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 21:48 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> 2011/7/18 Norman Maurer <[email protected]>: >> > Hi there, >> > >> > just to be more clear. I'm not very strong with it, so if others >> > prefer we can just release it like it is... >> >> I leave this to you and Oleg. Either way it is not an elegant solution >> and we'll need to fix that part of the api (configuration + advanced >> features) in future releases (IMO). >> >> Stefano >> > > Sorry for being blunt but MessageServiceFactory / ServiceLocator stuff > was not of my making. I had nothing to do with it and have nothing to > contribute there.
What we have now is the result of what I did in a first place and how you changed it to make it pass your review. You wanted to remove the abstract classes in favor of interfaces for parser/builders and wanted to remove that methods I added (e.g: setDecodeMonitor was a method of the public api abstract class), so you can't say "I had nothing to do with it", now ;-) As I said I'm fine with a 0.7 release from the current trunk, but this doesn't mean that dom is complete and stable: as we call it 0.x I don't see issues with this plan and there is no need to delay the release more. Stefano
