So should I reroll later ?
Bye,
Norman
Am 20.07.2011 13:07, schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
2011/7/20 Stefano Bagnara<[email protected]>:
The binary package only includes jars for "core" and not other jars.
Then I see there are 2 source releases, too.
removed the src package defined in the assembly module because apache
parent pom now defines a source release package when the
"apache-release" profile is enabled (and it is, during release).
renamed LICENSE/NOTICE to remove .txt so that the above assembly will
take our NOTICE/LICENSE instead of the defaults.
changed the bin.xml assembly to make sure it includes all of our
modules (previously it included only core).
Hope this is OK now.
Stefano
I'll try to have a look at both, soon, so maybe we can reroll it.
Stefano
PS: sorry Norman, I should have tested "mvn package" before asking you
to release.
2011/7/20 Norman Maurer<[email protected]>:
Hi there,
its time again for a new Apache James Mime4j release a.k.a 0.7. This
release contains a lot of bug fixes and improvements.
For a list of changes see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310521&version=12313592
Please review the artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-007/
[ ] +1 Yes, please release
[ ] +0 No time to review
[ ] -1 Something wrong with it
Bye,
Norman
