On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 16:50 +0100, Lukáš Vlček wrote: > Hi, > > First of all, thanks for this library! > > I am new to this list, but I have been using mime4j for some time now (but > I would not call myself an expert on it though). > > I switched from 0.6 to 0.7.1 recently and my tests started to fail in some > cases: > > 1) Parsing address: > > I have this in the mail header: > From: "=?utf-8?B?amlhY2NAZ2lsbGlvbi5jb20uY24=?=" <[email protected]> > > in 0.6 I was able to have it parsed into: "[email protected] < > [email protected]>" > I am unable to get the same result with 0.7.1 > > Another similar example is: > From: =?GBK?B?x67T7rrn?= <[email protected]> > > in 0.6 it was giving me: "钱宇虹 <[email protected]>" > in 0.7.1 I can not get it. > > > 2) CRLF instead of LF > > In body texts I am getting CRLF (\r\n) where I was getting LF (\n) with 0.6 > > > More generally, is there anything in particular I should pay attention to > when switching from 0.6 to 0.7.1 ? > > Regards, > Lukas
Lukas If you are reasonably sure mime4j does not correctly parse certain MIME messages please open raise a JIRA for each case separately and provide a sample message in binary format (as an attachment) and a test case reproducing the issue. Oleg
