Tim Allison created MIME4J-332:
----------------------------------
Summary: Prevent concatenation of duplicate fields
Key: MIME4J-332
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-332
Project: James Mime4j
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Tim Allison
Over on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-4447, [[email protected]]
reported that content disposition fields were concatenating file names if there
were multiple file names.
Minimal reproducer in {{master}} in {{{}ContentDispositionTest{}}}:
{code:java}
@Test
public void testDuplicateFields() throws ParseException {
String s = "attachment; filename=\"bar1.rtf\"; filename=\"bar2.rtf\";
filename=\"bar3.rtf\"";
ContentDispositionParser parser = new ContentDispositionParser(new
StringReader(s));
parser.parse();
assertEquals("bar1.rtf", parser.getParameters().get("filename"));
}
{code}
With result:
{noformat}
org.junit.ComparisonFailure:
Expected :bar1.rtf
Actual :bar1.rtfbar2.rtfbar3.rtf
{noformat}
I'm not sure whether the "correct" behavior is to pick the first or the last.
It looks like Thunderbird picks the first.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
