Kelson Vibber said:
> At 09:19 AM 1/28/2004, Steve Moore wrote:
>>Is it possible to have mimedefang use spamc/spamd rather than loading
>>spamassassin? And if so what changes do I make to mimedefang-filter to
>>accomplish this?
>
> MIMEDefang calls SpamAssassin's perl routines directly. It doesn't
> actually load SpamAssassin, so calling out to spamc/spamd would probably
> slow things down.
You could call it again from a procmail script for tagging (not rejection
of spam, for per user configurations.)
This is what I do.
sample procmailrc script:
########
#don't run spamc on messages over 256.
* < 256000
#man spamc to see switches
#sort the spam using spamc
:0fw: $HOME/spamassassin.lock
| /usr/bin/spamc -f -p 7070
#| /usr/bin/spamc -U /tmp/spamd.sock
#this looks at the exit code generated by spamc
#looking at exit codes is good!
:0 e
{
EXITCODE=$?
}
########
--
Luke Computer Science System Administrator
Security Administrator,College of Engineering
Montana State University-Bozeman,Montana
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
