-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Mark,
Me and a friend of mine at work were discussing this just a couple weeks ago. He mentioned a spell checker, and then the ratio of misspelled words against the number of correctly spelled words, or something to that affect. It seems like a good idea in theory, but I don't know if it would fly in practice? I don't know what the resource spike would be..
- -adam
on 2/10/2004 6:24 PM Mark said the following:
| Here I am thinking out loud while running through my spam log, would a | perl interface to a spell checker with some sort of weighting help kill | more of this junk? | | i.e if there are 100 words in the body, and 75% are misspelled, add it | to the score... | | comments, good idea, bad idea? | | | | _______________________________________________ | Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca | MIMEDefang mailing list | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang |
- -- - -adam - ----- "laughter is like music"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFAKX08Izrm594gvP4RAjPFAJwPIxHJw4u0qEon9n5pnyclljx7EACgjMc6 Oi3hV9F2pZE4eInf9nIF5Uc= =30PO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
