[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/20/2004 02:06:21 PM: > .65 is not that old, it's stable. That's good. > I'm running mimedefang 2.33 on some systems, if it works, don't touch it. > The users are happy, the process is stable, so I like it. > Change bad. Uptime good.
This morning I stumbled across a reference to a DoS vulnerability in 0.65, with a recommendation to upgrade to 0.67. More information at http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=351914 _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
