Sorry, you're confusing me with the original poster - I just did a sanity check on your post because I didn't recognise the MY_DSL rule which had been triggered.
> > However, I would be interested to know why your system triggered on > > MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME and mine didn't..... > __HAS_OUTLOOK_IN_MAILER X-Mailer =~ /Microsoft (CDO|Outlook)\b/ > > Seems that someone is finally using Office 2003....! > > Well, makes me wonder why someone would do such a thing :O) > But, smiles off, is the header "Microsoft Office Outlook" a > legal one ? > If it is I'll add it up to the .cf ! Not sure whether it is legal or not - I haven't seen Office 2003 so far, and since it is free text in a free text header, they could have put _anything_ there... Can anyone confirm that the Outlook in Office 2003 does indeed use this header? My point was that my rules are unchanged, so they didn't pick up that it came from Outlook. Your system did, so either it works on some other header to spot Outlook messages, or the rule has been updated to include this version of the header. Best Wishes, Paul. __________________________________________________ Paul Murphy Head of Informatics Ionix Pharmaceuticals Ltd 418 Science Park, Cambridge, CB4 0PA Tel. 01223 433741 Fax. 01223 433788 _______________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender or the Ionix IT Helpdesk on +44 (0) 1223 433741 _______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
