[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/27/2004 11:15:36 AM: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Which RFC(s) do these timeouts violate? > > RFC 1123, section 5.3.2. Which states "Based on extensive experience with busy mail-relay hosts, the minimum per-command timeout values SHOULD be as follows:"
The timeouts mentioned previously are much lower than the ones listed int eh RFC, but I don't see that as violating it. Network connections are also many orders of magnitude faster than they were in 1989, so adjusting the timeouts lower is probably not unreasonable. Back then, 9.6kb/s was screaming. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
