On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, David F. Skoll wrote: >Hi, All. > >At the office, we've (naturally) been talking about this patent. > >It's pretty clear to me that their claims are badly-written, overly-broad, >and covered by substantial prior art. I'm sure a compentent legal and >technical team could get the patent invalidated. > >I also can't imagine who Postini would go after. It makes no sense for them >to go after little guys like us, because we have no money. It makes no sense >for them to go after big guys like Brightmail, because Postini would get >clobbered in court. And there simply aren't that many medium-sized players >to go after. >
Well if they do go after you, please let us users know somehow so that we can start paying your legal defense. -- Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- You should consider any operational computer to be a security problem -- _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
