On 2004-04-13 (Tuesday) at 10:28:28 -0600, Nels Lindquist wrote: > On 13 Apr 2004 at 11:52, Michael Faurot wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > It depends what you mean by "tried this with MIMEDefang". > > > > Literally that. Is anyone currently using one of the SURBL plugins with > > SpamAssassin in a MIMEDefang environment? > > Yes. It's effectively not much different from a DNSBL check, so all > the usual MIMEDefang caveats for enabling those apply. > > So far it's been extremely effective, triggering on ~60% of caught > spam with zero false positives.
I'm getting good results too. Very useful at the moment, hopefully it'll stay that way. Being a SpamAssassin test the score can always be tweaked in the future if spammers manage to make it less reliable. Mark. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
