On 5 May 2004 at 14:20, Al Sparks wrote:
> I'm running MIMEDefang 2.41, and SpamAssassin 2.43. I have the
> following in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/ sa-mimedefang.cf file:
>
> required_hits 1
Yikes! Really? Don't you get tons of FPs?
> header SPAMHAUS eval:check_rbl('spamhaus', 'sbl.spamhaus.org.')
> describe SPAMHAUS mm added
> tflags SPAMHAUS net
> score SPAMHAUS 5.0
Does this test do anything different from the default RCVD_IN_SBL
rules?
> More importantly, I'm not getting any DCC_CHECK indicators in our
> headers. I thought that was working (and it was painful to get it to
> work the first time).
>
> When I do a spamassassin --lint �D it finds dccproc. How do I
> troubleshoot this?
Once you've got that worked out, you may want to try using dccifd
instead--it's significantly faster than dccproc.
----
Nels Lindquist <*>
Information Systems Manager
Morningstar Air Express Inc.
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
