Hello I realise this is more of a spamassassin question, but thought list members here might have some quick stats for comparison (particularly running without bayes)
I am trying to work out "typical" results for how much spam SA catches in it's default configuration, without bayes or dnsrbl (or any network tests) configured. My understanding was that it would be in the order of 70%, but I am getting between 30-40% on the corpus I have (~2k spam all from the last few months). Does this sound right to people, or is there something obviously wrong with my setup (other than not having tweaked scores, rules, etc)? Any information would be appreciated. Thanks _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
