Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> From a standards perspective, it sender '<>' legit?
>
> Yes.
>
> http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-dsn.php
>
Strangely enough, this also touches on the original question of "what do I do if an MX
resolves to 127.0.0.1" - the following paragraph is a quote from the above URL:
If any of the valid MX servers for a domain have private, reserved, or otherwise bogus
IP addresses, then the domain would be listed [in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org]. (E.g., given
an address of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, if the MX for example.tld is mail.example.tld, and
the A record listed in DNS for mail.example.tld is 127.0.0.1, then example.tld would
be listed.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
perl -e"map{y/a-z/l-za-k/;print}shift" "Jjhi pcdiwtg Ptga wprztg,"
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
