> To my inexperienced eye it seems extremely elegant/sensible to > separate this functionality out of MimeDefang - gives MimeDefang less > to do, simplifies filters, etc. Does anyone know better?
The very first greylisting implementation that I used was milter-greylist, but I found that some virus senders were getting whitelisted because their traffic travelled through normal mail servers. This meant that future viruses from this same computer to the same recipient would go through without being greylisted. In the MimeDefang-based greylisting implementation that I use now (www.bl.org/~jpk/md-greylist), an IP number is removed from the whitelist if a spam or virus is received from it. This cut down on repeat virus traffic quite a bit. Regards, John _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
