On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:43:54AM -0700, Jeremy Mates wrote:
> * Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >I would rather use "hostname/port" than "hostname:port" to prepare for
> > >the miraculous day when IPv6 is widely used. :-)
> >
> > What do IPv6 URL's do instead of using the :port syntax?
It's described in RFC2732, and indeed uses [literal-ipv6]:port,
eg. "[2001:888:0:4::119]:119" would be a valid address+port
combination.
--
#!perl -wpl # mmfppfmpmmpp mmpffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
$p=3-2*/[^\W\dmpf_]/i;s.[a-z]{$p}.vec($f=join('',$p-1?chr(sub{$_[0]*9+$_[1]*3+
$_[2]}->(map{/p|f/i+/f/i}split//,$&)+97):qw(m p f)[map{((ord$&)%32-1)/$_%3}(9,
3,1)]),5,1)='`'lt$&;$f.eig; # Jan-Pieter Cornet
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
