On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 10:40 -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > I meant more along what are you doing with SPF. Are you rejecting mail? Are > you creating a header? Etc. I believe someone else already posted that if > you have headers with SPF status in them, you can trigger on those headers > using SpamAssassin or MD quite easily. > > So basically, what do you have sendmail doing based on SPF records? I'm > assuming you may be rejecting connections and that would mean you would > ignore SPF in sendmail and fall down to the MD level to implement the SPF > check which could have dubious gains. > > Perhaps a better question is: What problem are you trying to solve that the > SPF<->Sendmail tie-in doesn't provide?
All valid questions. Lets see, i currently have sendmail doing the headers and also doing the checks, though i may move this out in favor of spfmilter doing it, tho i prefer c to perl for performance. I was really looking for alternative approaches to my sendmail-spf implementation, as i have some other checks (i.e. sid-milter and dk-milter) checks i wanted to do the same thing for if possible. Michael Weiner All information contained in this email is confidential and may be used by the intended recipient only.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
