On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 07:24:45AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> > Are you looking at the number of recipient addresses or the number
> > of messages for this test? Or does the current crop of spam-worms
> > generally send a message per recipient?
>
> Interesting point! I bet ISPs lower MaxRecipientsPerMessage to something
> like 10 or so...
Hah! We (xs4all, ISP) just lowered MaxRecipientsPerMessage to 100, and
we had all sorts of customers complaining that their outlook would no
longer process their homegrown "mailinglists" in the Bcc field.
Which is a feature, of course, but the customers sometimes have trouble
seeing that :)
--
#!perl -wpl # mmfppfmpmmpp mmpffm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
$p=3-2*/[^\W\dmpf_]/i;s.[a-z]{$p}.vec($f=join('',$p-1?chr(sub{$_[0]*9+$_[1]*3+
$_[2]}->(map{/p|f/i+/f/i}split//,$&)+97):qw(m p f)[map{((ord$&)%32-1)/$_%3}(9,
3,1)]),5,1)='`'lt$&;$f.eig; # Jan-Pieter Cornet
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
