On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:46:57PM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote: > Does anyone use File::Scan with MIMEDefang? It seems to cause a lot > of problems with false positives.
I've never heard from a user about a false positive, and we are in the 2 Million or so inbound mails per month range. I scan first with File::Scan because of its speed, then ClamAV, and finally McAfee. Here are my last 5 months of virus volume from Internet mail, and the amount detected per scanner: month sep oct nov dec jan File::Scan 7588 11599 21210 29947 4969 ClamAV 2914 6065 12914 11455 4564 McAfee 1642 1626 92 267 18 Due to its speed I will continue to use it as my first scanner. Matt -- Matthew S. Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Office: 717-396-5032 Infrastructure Security Analyst Fax: 717-396-5590 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Cell: 717-917-7099 _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
