On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, -ray wrote:
So just to confirm. For all the rules with 'tflag net' set, i should set their score to zero in local.cf to avoid editing files in /usr/share/spamassassin directly. If the score on a network test is already zero, then spamassassin will just skip it. Correct?
For the archives, i ran this:
cat /usr/share/spamassassin/* | grep '^tflag' | grep net | awk '{print "score "$2" 0"}' >> /etc/mail/mimedefang/sa-mimedefang.cf
Commented out the SURBL (since i want to use them). Set SALocalTestsOnly=0 and bam, SURBL tests started working! Hopefully other other network tests aren't being used or my mailserver won't last long...haha. In general are all the other network tests DNS based?
Also while poking around, some SURBL mails got through cause BAYES_00 gave a negative score. In general do ya'll let BAYES_* rules score negative? What about the other negative scores? Just set them to zero? thanks for any info...
ray -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ray DeJean http://www.r-a-y.org Systems Engineer Southeastern Louisiana University IBM Certified Specialist AIX Administration, AIX Support =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
