Rob MacGregor wrote:
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:25:06 GMT, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

ClamAV, which I am now testing, works as advertised. But I read
you get a "ClamAV installation is OUTDATED" message whenever
the update program decides you need a newer version.


Probably because they've still not hit a 1.0 release yet and it's very
heavily in development.  It'll still work if you don't upgrade, you
just don't get the new signatures.


This will run on a production server; I cannot halt things every
week to upgrade clamav.


No need to halt things, though my general position is that running
development releases of software on a production system should, where
possible, be avoided.

I've been running ClamAV for the past 3 versions (.80 to .83) for serveral months on a small server with about 25 users. The upgrade process is somewhat of a pain, as it seems to be fairly frequent, and you will get that message that you are outdated when a new release comes out. However, to get the level of protection that it's supplying is worth it. Previously, we'd get about 10 virii a day. Since installing, maybe one a month. To make sure that new virii aren't getting by, I don't mind upgrading. The upgrade is pretty straightforward each time and takes me about 15 minutes now.


Bottom line, IMHO, beats the pants of the Symantec AV Enterprise that I run as well. Easier to administrate, does the job better, and it's free.


--

Scott Plumlee
PGP Public key: http://plumlee.org/pgp/
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to