> -----Original Message----- > From: David F. Skoll > My colleague Dave O'Neill pointed out that Clam has > signatures against phishing attacks (which are > platform-independent.) It blocks about six per day for us. > > Do any commercial AV scanners have phishing signatures? If > not, that's a very strong argument for Clam.
I run Clam on MD acting as a relay to an Exchange server running McAfee. Before I upgraded to a version of Clam that would catch phishing e-mails, the McAfee would regularly catch them. There is still an occasional one that McAfee catches that slipped past Clam. I have no clue if the Unix version catches them. _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
