James Ebright wrote:
Well, we have ended up only running the hard reject in the hack, the temp
fails eventually ended up proving that many people/companies running mail
servers really should not be! :-P

Tell us about it. (grumble grumble)

The hard reject in the hack seems to work well, has not yet generated a false
positive response and does give back an immediate response to the sender.

Not if they run MS Exchange. I've testing online with a user while I had him on the phone.. all MS says is something bland like, "Can't deliver mail"... even though my server sends back a very descript failure code and message.


<rant>
So the users (trained in the ways of InternetExploder) just figure there's a "DNS or server error" and sit at their desks and cry. (I'm guessing to some of that of course... but not the crying part.) ;)
</rant>


-Ben
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Reply via email to