On Thu, 26 May 2005 15:05:26 -0400, James Ebright wrote > I am not saying we are fool proof, but this attack seems unlikely > enough to succeed that is it would be unreasonable for us > inconvenience to our customer base by blocking port 25, not to > mention we would probably detect it as a potential DOS attack via > our IDS fairly quickly anyway simply due to the latency/traffic it > would cause.
This should read port 25 incoming... /sigh/ returned from vacation, still catching up on sleep as well as email. ;-) Jim -- EsisNet.com Webmail Client _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
