-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Possible solutions to more fairly treat each scanner: > * randomize the order that message_contains_virus calls scanners > * call all scanners for all messages - even if the first scanner found a virus, call the others - and log all "find"s for each message_contains_virus call I have no interest in randomizing the order in which my different scanners run. My concern was to use the fastest scanners first (those that are already memory resident) before calling any externally-loaded binaries. As shown, I am better able to justify to management the effectiveness of the free scanners by showing a lower ROI for their investment in a commercial scanner (all the while, imposing a lighter load on my systems, and yet still giving management the "warm-fuzzy" that they get from running a commercially-supported product - something they seem to find necessary in this day of SCO lawsuits and legal shyness with regard to Open Source in general.) Ken _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
