On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:37:00 -0500 (CDT), Jim McCullars wrote > If he knows for a fact that he wants to reject those emails > outright, then rejecting them in filter() and avoiding a call to SA > is the more prudent choice.
Well, while true it would be more efficient, I would not call it more prudent, to me allowing the end user the choice to decide what is and is not spam when the only positive hit might be the charset is more prudent, you can easily allow for that in SA. Basically you loose the flexibility SA allows for a bit more efficiency (probably a moot amount unless you are slammed with these types of messages). But, as you pointed out, it is his call. Also, Dirk, if you have a spam corpus of 10 years then you need to read the thread about prior art and some recent patent debates, your information may be usefull... [or were you exagerating a tad ;-) ] Jim -- EsisNet.com Webmail Client _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
