--On Monday, September 12, 2005 3:06 PM -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, it's missing the issue that while CNAMEs are not RFC compliant,
people do use them. And I also found a bug where the MX resolution is
supposed to be returned in preference order but it doesn't seem to be done
so in reality.
Good catches. It was originally coded just to check for existence (so no
need for priority), with the assumption that I had control over all
participants' DNS (so no need for the CNAME check). Adding those features
would certainly make the code more generally useful.
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
