[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today's Topics:
1. RE: MX -> 127.0.0.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:59:39 -0700
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] MX -> 127.0.0.1
To: <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
KAM wrote:
Thanks for the extra test cases. Assuming they should all fail,
here's my new test stub. Looks good to me. Review and comment
appreciated.
http://www.pccc.com/downloads/MIMEDefang/contrib/check_primary_mx_stub.pl
Review:
Why do we only care about the first? I'm tempted to say, fail if ANY of the MX
records is invalid. Are there any broken configs out there that have
multirecord MX's with only one of them (not the first) being 127.0.0.1?
You might also want to look back at the archives for this list around
late-March/early-April of this year (and possibly earlier). I seem to
recall there being a similiar question being asked around that time, and
at least one code snippet posted as well, if memory serves.
Depending on what modules you allow yourself, you may be able to make
your life a little simpler by using one of the modules that can handle
IP addresses or address ranges.
-Albert C.
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
