[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/12/2005 05:24:53 PM: > I'm not arguing it's right or good, I'm simply saying it's commonplace and > will cause false positives. > > I'm also not sure yet if I would use this to reject or discard emails. That > code (based on Joseph Brennan's) is coming later.
Regardless of how you feel about bounce vs drop on spams, this might be one where rejecting should be done. This will notify the sending site that they have hosed DNS entries. Including a link to a page with explanation on why their DNS is fubar would be good. (That assumes the sending host includes the rejection notice. I've been asked to diagnose messages that only say that the delivery failed and do not include any details. Useless!) _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
