--On Wednesday, December 28, 2005 4:00 PM -0500 James Ebright
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In addition, I believe rejecting email due to an invalid HELO/EHLO is a
rfc violation in of itself (MUST NOT even). That said, the only ones I
reject are the ratware ones that say they are me (my ip blocks or
localhost or my own FQDN). ;-)
You could still add SpamAssassin points for envelope violations. You can
either add some headers before passing the message to SA, or add the points
to what SA returns. (I found that SA does add points if the claimed name of
a "Received from" server doesn't match its reverse DNS.)
I reject messages that score 10 or more, and an invalid EHLO might be
enough to push a message over the limit, so I may be technically violating
the RFC. I won't lose sleep over that.
_______________________________________________
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list [email protected]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
